MLFCCA

The Supreme Court says a Freedom of Information Act request cannot be used to trigger a False Claims Act lawsuit.

The court on Monday voted 5-3 to agree with arguments by Schindler Elevator Corp., which sought to get a lawsuit against it dismissed.

Daniel Kirk, a former employee, sued on behalf of the government, claiming Schindler had not complied with reporting requirements involving the employment of Vietnam veterans.

<!– NEW Ad placement inside of wires story well START.

This is a new ad position: 300×250 but I'm using the Ad_Right position for the mock-up
which is occasionally 300×600. The spec in Google Wave calls for this ad to be placed
inside a story at 'X' amount of words. Not sure how that will be accomplished programmatically,
but if for example the ad is placed in the middle of a paragraph, it should be smart enough to
add a

as well as a

to preserve formatting of the story paragraphs.

//–>

But a judge threw out his lawsuit, saying Kirk’s information came from a FOIA request. The False Claims Act says that lawsuits cannot be filed using publicly disclosed information. The judge said FOIA reports were public information.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City overturned that decision but the high court said it was correct.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the court’s opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented and was joined by Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor.

Justice Elena Kagan did not participate because she worked on this case while serving as solicitor general.

The case is Schindler Elevator Corp. v United States, 10-188.